wifemomartist:

jgamer-aspie:

wifemomartist:

jgamer-aspie:

butterflyinthewell:

Using your PC to explain autism to people who don’t get it.

My brain tries to acknowledge literally everything, and I have to decide whether to click “yes” or “no’ when it prompts me to acknowledge or ignore stimuli. 

Clock ticking? Y/N … N
Cat running wildly through the house? Y/N … N
Telephone ringing? Y/N … Y
Name called? Y/N … Y

I might click ‘no’ without ‘reading’ the message, but I’m still acknowledging it long enough to discard it. 

Stimming is me idling as I decide what to do if there is more than one alert popping up. It can also help me close a lot of alert boxes at once as long as more don’t pop up while I’m trying to close what’s already there. I’ll probably develop a lot of lag if more alerts pop up.

Meltdowns and shutdowns are the program freezing and crashing because there’s too much popping up at once and not enough RAM. The system can’t handle all that data.

If I’m sick, hungry, tired, injured, or dealing with monthly female stuff, my body will be generating its own stimulus popups to compete with popups from outside. Internal popups take up RAM normally allocated for handling external stuff, so my program will lag more and crash faster on fewer external popups.

And that’s it.

–Side note, I am not a technical person at all, but this analogy seems to make the most sense to people.

That analogy actually works rather well.

this is so perfect. except it’s almost like i don’t get a choice whether to acknowledge or ignore the stimuli, i have to acknowledge it because ignoring isn’t really an option.. but overall this is totally on point and i love it.

I guess it’s not like “ignore” this, but the stimulus(like the dialog box) requires conscious thought to close it, whether you choose to act upon that stimulus or not.

yeah maybe “ignore” was the wrong word.. i just meant that it gets processed either way. 🙂