ephemeral-elegance:

Welcome back to FRIDAY FASHION FACT! Today’s topic is one
that seems to be quite the curiosity to many people, or, more
accurately, to many women. That’s right, I’m finally covering maternity
wear in the age of corsets! It’s no wonder why this topic is so
perplexing to so many people- it is a shockingly un-discussed area of
fashion history. We rarely, if ever, see images of pregnant women
throughout history. What we commonly see, though, is women with
teeny-tiny waists that are caged in and perfectly flattened by stays and
corsets. Clearly, those styles didn’t leave much room for a little
alien growing in a woman’s belly. Yet the fact that we all here today is
proof that the vast majority of women throughout history were pregnant
at some point in their lives. This means that some sort of clothing
accommodating a rapidly growing midsection had to exist. So what did it
look like?

Up until the Renaissance, maternity wear was
barely, if at all, different from regular dress. This is because in these early
days, clothing was not fitted to the body. Fabric was cut in rectangular
pieces that were laced together, making it easy to tighten or loosen a
dress. During pregnancy, women would simply loosen the lacing, allowing
more of her underlayers of clothing to be visible, possibly adding additional layers. Later in a
pregnancy, women simply stayed at home, meaning they could just wear
loose undergarments and open robes. During the late Middle Ages, it was
in fact fashionable for a woman to appear pregnant, whether or not she
actually was. They would wear high waisted gowns with extra fabric
gathered around her belly, thus making specific maternity wear unnecessary.

By the Renaissance, though, seams and
structure became integral parts of fashion. Stays came into fashion
(read here) resulting in a restricted bodice. During this era, women
would loosen the bottom of their stays as much as possible during the
early part of their pregnancy, thus causing the bump to appear rather
low. Those who could afford new clothing would wear shortened bodices as
their stomachs grew larger. Those who could not had two options. One,
they would wear a man’s waistcoat paired with their loose underlayers
and skirts. This is because during this era men’s waistcoats had vents
in the back, held together by lacing which could be loosened. The other
option was to wear a bodice that laced in the front, leaving the lacing
around the belly open. This would then be covered up with an apron. Using an apron to cover an open bodice that accommodated a full belly remained the go-to style for the pregnant poor for the next couple of
centuries.

The first official pregnancy garment was created
in the 17th century. Known as the Adrienne dress, the style had loose
folds of fabric where normally a fitted waist would be found. The
Adrienne developed throughout the next century, and by the 18th century
it often included a bib that could be folded down for breastfeeding. In the
early 19th century Neoclassical era, fashion was once again in a style
that easily accommodated a pregnant figure. By the 1820s, though,
structured undergarments made their way back into style, soon becoming
the cinched-waisted corsets we associate with the word today. However, maternity corsets
were also created around this time. These garments were created to
shape, support, and minimize the appearance of a belly. They were
adjustable, and some had flaps for breastfeeding. There were countless
styles created, all boasting some new-found advantage.

Throughout
the 19th and early 20th centuries, maternity wear would either raise or
lower waistlines, depending on which was more fashionable at the time,
to accommodate the shape. The crinoline era used empire waists, as
well as separate blouses and skirts, often covered by a large jacket to
hide the bump. At home, wrappers and robes were extremely common. The bustle era, with its drop waists, attempted to hide
the shape by smoothing it down into folds of fabric by the hips. When
tea gowns- unstructured, flowing dresses- were developed towards the end
of the Victorian era, they became the fashionable choice for women at
home, particularly towards the end of their term. Yet the birth (get it??) of the ready to wear
industry (read here) and the downfall of the corset shortly after caused
maternity wear to shift towards the distinctive garments we often think
of today. That, however, is a topic for another day.

Have a
question about fashion history that you want answered in the next
FRIDAY FASHION FACT? Just click the ASK button at the top of the page!

luxy-lightning:

thestrangedaysofkrei:

knitmeapony:

28weekslaterhater:

knitmeapony:

ravenclawslibrary:

smurflewis:

DONT ASK ME THIS, THIS IS HOW THE TROJAN WAR STARTED, I DONT WANT THIS MAN

Right away, Aphrodite popped into my head.

And then I’m just like, “DAMMIT, DID YOU LEARN NOTHING FROM PARIS? YOU ARE AN EMBARRASSMENT, AND NOW ALL THE TROJANS ARE DEAD. I HOPE YOU’RE HAPPY.”

If you are ever actually in this situation, pro-tip: name Persephone.  Half the goddesses will be too surprised to smite you immediately and while Hades won’t do you any favors he may at least high-five you while your on your way down.

Another tip: name Mesperyian. Not only will you shock everyone, including her (since Aphrodite was a jealous ho who burnt half her face off), but you’ll win Hades’ favour. As his most beloved daughter, anything that praises her will make you a kind human to her, an okay human to him, and a genuinely good person to anyone else.

I heartily endorse this alternative answer.

I love how all of this advice leads to “please Hades at all costs.”

image

museum-of-artifacts:

Roman Farmer’s calendar. Rome, Museo della Civiltà Romana, inv. M.C.R. n. 3485 Each side bears the names of three months of the year. For each month we can see, starting from the top: the number of days in it; the day on which the Nones (the day of the Moon’s first quarter) falls; the duration of the day and night expressed in hours; the sign of the zodiac; the protecting divinity; work to be attended to in the fields; and the most important festivities.

Crusader Kings II: Horses Rule The World

nowrongwaytoplay:

This Kotaku article chronicles how fans of Crusader Kings II – an incredibly interesting and complex medieval political simulator  – managed to find an exploit in the game that allows players to create a dynasty of horses. Like, giddy-up-giddy-up-let’s-go horses.

Long story short: the devs, as a joke, inserted a horse councillor into the game who can’t do basically anything. Unless you nominate him to be bishop, and find a way to kill off the current bishop. Once the horse takes control of the church, they magically become able to get married and create heirs.

Long story even shorter: One player managed to restore the Roman Empire using nothing but horses.

greenekangaroo:

scrawlers:

australopithecusrex:

relax-o-vision:

dedalvs:

roachpatrol:

kateordie:

freezecooper:

Ppl be like “ I want an actual male gem, not just Steven.”

Jeez, it’s like having only one character

to represent your whole gender

in a group composed all of another gender

is a bit upsetting huh?

I wonder

what

that’s like

no really

can you 

even imagine

what this lack of representation

MUST 

FEEL 

LIKE

This

post

isn’t

long

enough

none of the listed shows are named after the one female character, either

it’s actually physically impossible for me to not reblog this post.

I want to say I’ve reblogged this before, but I’m reblogging again for the brilliant addition of, “None of the listed shows are named after the one female character, either” because FUCKING THANK YOU.

mmmmmhm.