poorlydescribedpterrybooks:

luninosity:

And here is the proper call for submissions for the Terry Pratchett book. Assume a fan-scholar audience: we expect original and thoughtful submissions, aware of previous scholarship and existing conversations, relatively academic and professional  in tone but light on jargon and accessible to interested readers.

##

Call
For Papers: Ethics and Choice in the
Works of Terry Pratchett

Keep reading

Hey, folks! We’ve seen your excellent meta and analysis, and we think you should submit it. We can’t wait to see what you write. Mind how you go.

@fox-bright @violent-darts

How can we distinguish what is biologically determined from what people merely try to justify through biological myths? A good rule of thumb is ‘Biology enables, culture forbids.’ Biology is willing to tolerate a very wide spectrum of possibilities. It’s culture that obliges people to realise some possibilities while forbidding others. Biology enables women to have children – some cultures oblige women to realise this possibility. Biology enables men to enjoy sex with one another – some cultures forbid them to realise this possibility.

Culture tends to argue that it forbids only that which is unnatural. But from a biological perspective, nothing is unnatural. Whatever is possible is by definition also natural. A truly unnatural behaviour, one that goes against the laws of nature, simply cannot exist, so it would need no prohibition. No culture has ever bothered to forbid men to photosynthesise, women to run faster than the speed of light, or negatively charged electrons to be attracted to each other.

In truth, our concepts ‘natural’ and unnatural’ are taken not from biology, but from Christian theology. The theological meaning of ‘natural’ is ‘in accordance with the intentions of the God who created nature’. Christian theologians argued that God created the human body, intending each limb and organ to serve a particular purpose. If we use our limbs and organs for the purpose envisioned by God, then it is a natural activity. To use them differently than God intends is unnatural. But evolution has no purpose. Organs have not evolved with a purpose, and the way they are used is in constant flux. There is not a single organ in the human body that only does the job its prototype did when it first appeared hundreds of millions of years ago. Organs evolve to perform a particular function, but once they exist, they can be adapted for other usages as well. Mouths, for example, appeared because the earliest multicellular organisms needed a way to take nutrients into their bodies. We still use our mouths for that purpose, but we also use them to kiss, speak and, if we are Rambo, to pull the pins out of hand grenades. Are any of these uses unnatural simply because our worm-like ancestors 600 million years ago didn’t do those things with their mouths?

Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (Harari, Yuval Noah)

A tradition

wakor-rising:

sonatagreen:

In peacetime, the ruler grows their hair long. In war, they cut it short.

A ruler with long hair is held in great esteem, for defending the peace.

The traditional declaration of war is for the ruler to send their cut-off hair to the enemy ruler. The statement carries greater weight the longer the hair: to receive long hair says that you have angered one who is slow to anger, that you have incurred a wrath not easily woken.

Violent war-mongering leader frantically and aggressively tries to shave just a LITTLE hair off the top of their head into an envelope.

A faraway king receives a heavy wooden crate filled with a coil of the longest hair he has ever seen.

A despised ruler finds hundreds of pounds of cut-off ponytails at her castle entrance, each one belonging to her own people. 

A young emperor refuses to cut their hair and insists on trying to make peace with invaders. The enemy leader steps forward, draws their blade, and cuts the emperor’s hair themselves.

Hellen cuts her hair off and throws it in Cathy’s face at her son’s soccer scrimmage. 

Find your name with the gif button and add the one that is the most relatable

packbat:

justaphage:

missdaviswrites:

trickybonmot:

hiddenlacuna:

homosociallyyours:

amythe3lder:

iwantthatbelstaffanditsoccupant:

agenttanha:

lawyermargo:

astudyinsnoggy:

sherlocks-final-resolve-is-love:

sensei-sama-sugoi:

sherlockfandomtandem:

reparo-live-soul:

askdoratonks:

gingerstellagiulia:

strange-book-club:

toobadhesfictional:

No my name isn’t Olaf

This is actually the only one that shows up if I use the name that I go by.

apparently this bearded dragon and I share a name and I am happy with that.