what are your thoughts on mary magdalene? also i love your blog and your poetry x

boykeats:

resurrection was delivered into the hands of a single woman like. before anyone else, jesus and his wildfire blood came to her to tell her that yes, these miracles do happen, this future isn’t empty, you are saved, you are saved now and forever.

and who was she? mary, from a village by the sea. a girl who grew up singing saltwater hymns while sickness burned in her body. when the messy-haired, sunlight-boned wanderer burst into town with his pack of young rebels, she looked god right in his human eyes and said, “i’m not afraid. heal me.” she watched the romans kill him slowly, and she wept, and she ached, and she spent two nights sitting in the dirt outside the tomb, whispering prayers to the stars like it might be worth something, anything, everything. and it was.

and we couldn’t believe that christ would want to trust a woman before anyone else, so we wrote her down as a sinner and a person of bad character, even though she was neither. we made her name synonymous with prostitution, even though there’s no biblical evidence to support that. history likes to pretend she had little power but without her there would be no witness to the news.

a young woman is the mortal catalyst for one of the biggest turning points in christian theology! a young woman who runs to other women first! that’s who christ placed his trust in above everyone else to bear the sight of the resurrection. isn’t that spectacular?

One of my favorite bits in the Gospel of Thomas is when Peter goes “Lord, why do you keep telling Mary, a Mere Woman, all your secrets when you don’t tell them to us?” and Jesus looks him dead in the eye and says “because she’s cooler than you. Stop being such a whiny putz and be more like her and maybe I’ll tell you secrets too.”

vampireapologist:

digivolvin:

libby-doe-mods-denofiniquity:

digivolvin:

person of color: hey wouldn’t it be cool if angels were represented as brown or black more often–

edgy whites who went to a week of bible study 15 yrs ago and regurgitate all their Superior Knowledge from textually inaccurate all-caps tumblr posts written by supernatural fans: um…… ACTUALLY 🙂 angels don’t look like HUMANS they look like ELDRITCH NIGHTMARES™ that MELT YOUR BRAIN OUT so stop giving them skin colors 🙂 try a few animal heads instead 🙂 don’t forget the eyeballs 🙂 

But it’s true?? That’s why they’re always saying “do not be afraid”. Some of them have three faces on one head?? It’s in both Old Testament and Revelations.

i mean, this is my favorite of all subjects so why not chat about it a little. sorry in advance for the essay you didn’t ask for, but i’m getting a lot of smartasses on this post telling me the Edgy Whites aren’t wrong. so let’s go:

1) even if it was true (which it’s not, i will get to that) this wouldn’t be an adequate reason for criticizing or derailing poc who are trying to subvert the association of divinity/purity & whiteness. you know the idea of the aryan race came from the myth of divine whiteness? you know how all fantasy elves are pale slender & white, thanks to j.r.r. tolkein’s prevailing white/christian influence? so if you see poc trying to reframe this, let them!

2) it isn’t true. don’t get me wrong, you can envision, interpret, and portray angels however you want, that’s part of the fun of art and writing and fantasy. i know that a certain post influenced how a lot of people on tumblr imagine angels (again, because people like subverting popularized imagery) but if we’re talking about biblical accuracy, then let’s be biblically accurate. 

more specifically, if someone is going to condescend to poc (or anyone!) about the “factual” appearances of angels in the bible, then they damn better get it right. 

to start with– angels as winged messengers were popularized after the roman catholic church began co-opting greco-roman imagery, and modeled much of their depictions of angels after hermes and eros. so yeah, the image of pale white angels is tiresome and not technically accurate to the bible.

that said, the majority of angels in the bible very likely appeared as wingless humans with occasional supernatural attributes. 

biblical angels are understood by theologists & angelologists to exist in a celestial hierarchy, de coelesti hierarchia, which accounts for nine distinct types. they’re organized in tiers, so to speak. within the first sphere are seraphim, cherubim, and ophanim. this first choir resides within the inner sanctum of heaven; they are the lovecraftian ones tumblr is so big on. 

the seraphim (isaiah 6:1-8 and revelations 4:8, the burning ones, sometimes interpreted as a mass of serpents, multiple eyes, etc.) the cherubim (isaiah 1:5-11 and ezekiel 1:5-13, multiple wings, multiple faces) and ophanim (ezekial 1:15-21′s iconic Wheels™) are all witnessed by prophets. not in visitations, but in visions of heaven. these are THE scary angels, the angels of the guillermo del toro persuasion. 

but, they exist outside of sight from humans, which is why it was exclusively prophets who could describe them. they do not come down to earth to chat with random civilians. they’re too busy with the tasks of the omniscient, and their proximity to god is what makes them so powerful and so otherworldly. (and no, you won’t drop dead just looking at them: only god is said to be that powerful.) 

the second choir– the dominions, virtues, and powers– are typically interpreted to remain unseen and work on the spiritual plane, tasked with more menial things than the first choir, keeping the nonphysical realm in working order. 

the third choir are the ones who move between heaven and earth to serve humans: the principalities, archangels and angels. these are the ones most regularly described in the bible as messengers, guides, and guardians who take on the form of man in order to serve and aide them. almost every mention of angelic messengers or apparitions in the bible is an angel of the third choir. 

(side note: the only angels not accounted for in the celestial hierarchy are the nephilim: the fallen ones who had children by humans, referenced in genesis 6:1–4 and often considered to be demons.)

so if the angels appearing to humans aren’t abominations, why do they scare people so badly? 

the phrase “do not be afraid/be not afraid” is said in variations over 100 times in the bible, not exclusively by angels. most often it’s spoken as an assurance of god’s love and protection. yes, a handful of times it’s said by angels. (matthew 1:20, matthew 28:5, luke 1:13, luke 1:30, luke 2:10, to name some prominent instances.) almost every single one of these, the angel in question is doing just that– assuring vulnerable or frightened people that god is protecting them. 

most notable of these angels is gabriel, the archangel and messenger who appears to mary to tell her she will conceive jesus. let’s look at the context at play: mary was a young unwed woman who would not have been accustomed to spending time alone with young man outside her family. when gabriel appears to her, a strange man in her home, she has every reason to be frightened. gabriel goes on to tell her that she’s going to be the mother of god, and this is when he reassures her not to be afraid, because it will be done through god’s workings. gabriel ≠ an eldritch horroterror. 

the second instance is that of the messenger angel who tells the women of jerusalem not to be afraid, but jesus has been raised from the dead. this angel is described as unearthly, and tbqh he’s dope as hell: “his appearance was like lightning, and his clothing white as snow.” (matthew 28:5) there’s reason to believe this angel is of the same countenance as the one described in a vision in the book of daniel: “then i lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and beheld a certain man clothed in linen (…) his body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.” (daniel 10:5-7) my fave description of an angel in the bible by far, but… still not an eldritch horrorterror. 

in a third instance (luke 2:10), the angelic heralds who inform the sleeping shepherds of jesus’ birth do startle the men, and they do tell them not to fear. but it’s said its the glory of god emanating from them that scares the shepherds, not a monstrous appearance. 

the cosmic fear attributed to visits from the divine is called numinous dread, the terror that fills us when we’re approached by something we have no capacity to understand. numinous dread is akin to what makes people quiver at the thought of ghosts, or the size of distant planets, or the expanse of the universe– something incalculable and unknowable to the point of being frightening. this to me is by far the coolest aspect of angels. the fact that the very scope of their existence can tug and distort the fabric of our dimension, to the point that humans are bowled over by the merest whiff of their presence? it’s why angels who appear human but still frighten people is such an underrated concept.

you know the phrase “every angel is terrifying”? the author, rainer maria rilke, wrote endlessly on the nature of the human and divine, especially in his work the duino elegies. in the full quote from the first elegy, he mused on the vastness of angels in comparison to mortals:

“For beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror, which we are still just able to endure, and we are so awed because it serenely disdains to annihilate us. Every angel is terrifying.”

this, to me, is the most succinct and lovely illustration of angels, which doesn’t define them either as monsters or humans– he’s fixed on the feeling of awe that’s inherent to the divine, however it manifests. 

none of this invalidates creative interpretations of biblical angels! it just means you should not be talking down to anyone about their level of accuracy, especially in regards to race.

in summary: YES, some angels are scary looking in the bible. NO, not every single one looks like edgy white tumblr wants to believe. YES, everybody is allowed to have fun with their interpretations and portrayals, go wild. NO, it’s not even remotely acceptable to condescend to people who want to envision them as people of color because, textually, they manifest as humans in the bible, and everyone in the bible was brown and black. 

This is just simply awesome. I really enjoyed this read. Not only is it a wonderful response, but the information in it is so neat. Thank you, Sera!

triflesandparsnips:

nudlestrudel:

triflesandparsnips:

If you’ve ever had questions about Catholicism, here are all your answers as described by me, a Bad Catholic:

  • Yes, we totally think the wine turns to blood
    • but not, like, blood in our reality. like, blood in Plato’s cave
    • so yes, that makes us creepy vampires
    • but no, we can’t explain it
  • There’s a bunch of stuff we can’t explain, but we gotta believe in them anyway, so we just call them “mysteries” and move on
    • mysteries include the blood thing, the virgin birth thing, and the three-for-the-price-of-one God thing
    • every time I think of the mysteries of faith, I hear Geoffrey Rush say “It’s a mystery” like he did in Shakespeare in Love
  • (I’d like to briefly mention here that the Immaculate Conception doesn’t refer to Mary getting knocked up with Jesus. The IC was actually her mom Anne.)
    • (but Mary did have a virgin birth)
    • (because mysteries)
  • For a while there was a good chance that it wasn’t going to be a father-son-and-holy-ghost situation
    • the Council of Nicea in 325 was basically a big fan con trying to pin down what was canon versus fanon
    • St. Nicholas punched out a guy, and so his side got to win the debate
    • no really Santa got put in jail for assault and then apparently angels totes appeared and busted him out

  • Other religions think we’re weird for praying to Mary and the saints as well as to God-and-Co.
    • answer 1: Mary is one of the saints, and what the saints all have in common is that they were (mostly) real people who did (mostly) real stuff and are definitely now chilling with God. so they kind of know how it is for us folk, and they can handle the minor human problems while God, like, makes sure gravity keeps working or something
    • answer 2: we kept all the small household gods, yes we did
  • Things the Inquisition has, on record, worried about:
    • the nature of God
    • heliocentrism
    • cheese

Thank you this has been Lessons in Catholicism from a Bad Catholic

see the way i was taught was that we were like asking the saints to “intercede on our behalf” like gods secretaries, like, “hey mister saint anthony sir guy buddy, can i call u tony? also i know god is busy and all but like i cant find my damn keys no offense so could you maybe ask god if he could like, make them un lost, becuz i am late for work and this is kindof a problem.”

Yes this is probably a more accurate answer regarding saints.

Important things to know:

  • Saint histories are called hagiographies
    • sometimes, when you’re a kid, you get given these books full of saints and their histories, often with pictures
    • the pictures are usually either the saint staring up at God or angels idk, or it’s super gruesome pictures of the shit they went through in life
  • Awesome saints to know:
    • This is Saint Agnes. She got her tits cut off, and wants everyone to remember that really specifically

    • This is Saint Sebastian, who got tied to a tree and stuck full of arrows. He is the sexiest of our saints.

    • This is Saint Christina the Astonishing, who apparently isn’t real, but I call bullshit on that because after a near-death experience she couldn’t stand people anymore and went to really outrageous lengths to avoid them, thereby making her the patron saint of tumblr

  • Saints will have multiple things they’re “in charge of”
    • these things are almost always ironic and/or sometimes hilarious in combination
    • St. Agnes, for instance, is the patron saint of breast cancer (not hilarious)
    • St. Margaret of Antioch, who totally kicked her way out of dragon (WHO WAS SATAN), is the patron saint of childbirth. and explosives. and maybe also Monty Python, I’m not ruling it out
  • sometimes saints are the patrons of multiple things that make no sense at all
    • St Anne, mother of Mary and total spoiler of baby Jesus, is the saint of miners, mothers, equestrians, cabinet makers, homemakers, stablemen, French-Canadian voyageurs, and sailors
    • because of course she is
  • saints are basically amazing

What do angels actually look like per the bible?

mathblr:

bamf-castiel:

cameoamalthea:

glitterbomb-goblinking:

the-unreadable-book:

revelation19:

musiqchild007:

revelation19:

Well, according to Ezekiel 1 they might look something like this…

According to Daniel 10 something like this…

According to Isaiah 6…

In Ezekiel 10… 

Again in Ezekiel 10…

Basically, when the people writing Scripture tried to describe what they saw when they saw an angel… they run into the end of their imagination… they can never quite seem to fully explain it because they had trouble even comprehending what they saw, let alone being able to describe it to someone else. 

Yeah, that’s usually how people responded to seeing them in the Bible…

There’s a good reason why angels’ standard greeting is ‘Do not be afraid’.

I used to listen to this radio show and one thing I remember because it was so funny was a Christmas special where an angel showed up to tell the shepherds about the birth of Christ.  The conversations went:

Angel: “FEAR NOT.”

Shepherds: *screaming*

Angel: “I SAID FEAR NOT.”

Shepherds: *screaming LOUDER*

Angel: “WHAT PART OF FEAR NOT ARE YOU NOT UNDERSTANDING?”

So demons are fallen angels but they don’t look scary because they’re fallen, that’s just what all angels look like…

Maybe that’s why so many Christians see visions of Saints or the Virgin Mary instead…like Jesus is all…no, no see being human made me realize sending Angels might not be the best idea. I don’t know if humans can handle this. So I’m gonna just send mom

@fem-deanwinchester

I’M GONNA JUST SEND MOM

unsuspecting catholic: is this a mortal sin or just a venial sin? Is it a mortal sin to be okay with doing a venial sin? what if I die tomorrow?
Martin Luther, stepping out from the shadows: it’s all mortal sin
catholic: all bad deeds are mortal sins?
Martin Luther: bad deeds, good deeds
catholic: good deeds are mortal sins??
Martin Luther: no time to explain. it’s not safe here. I–
John Calvin: descends shrieking from the ceiling